ePapers Repository

De-coupling the state and the third sector? The ‘Big Society’ as a spontaneous order

Macmillan, Rob (2013) De-coupling the state and the third sector? The ‘Big Society’ as a spontaneous order. Working Paper. University of Birmingham, Birmingham.


URL of Published Version: http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Research/RealTimes/Thethirdsectorinunsettledtimesafieldguide/tabid/1031/Default.aspx


Despite a largely indifferent and otherwise sceptical public reception, the ‘Big Society’ has remained a central feature of the Conservative-led Coalition’s project, with David Cameron referring to it as his passion. However, the Big Society has been a rather elusive concept. Academics and commentators seek to understand what it means, what it signals, and what it might imply. It is viewed by critics as providing political cover for the Coalition’s deficit reduction programme and as a Trojan horse for privatisation. Others argue that it represents a significant recasting of the relationship between citizens and the state, as well as providing new opportunities and spaces for voluntary and community activity, recast as social action in civil society. This paper asks what the Big Society might mean for the ‘third sector’ of voluntary organisations, community groups and social enterprises, and in particular how the changing relationship with the state might be understood. The previous Labour government’s approach has been characterised as the development of a closer ‘partnership’ between state and the third sector. Whilst there are important continuities from this time, a partial decoupling may now be underway in the new political and economic context. Theoretically, this might signal a shift away from the idea of interdependence between the state and the third sector, and towards a model involving separate spheres: from partnership to an emergent ‘trial separation’. To explore this dynamic the paper draws on Friedrich Hayek’s theory of ‘spontaneous order’, suggesting that the Big Society involves some implicit Hayekian assumptions. It concludes by considering the implications of regarding the third sector in such terms.

Type of Work:Monograph (Working Paper)
School/Faculty:Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Social Sciences
Department:Third Sector Research Centre

Albrow, M. (2012) ‘’Big Society’ as a rhetorical intervention’ in A. Ishkanian and S. Szreter (eds) The Big Society Debate: A New Agenda for Social Welfare? Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp.105-115.
Alcock, P. (2010) ‘Building the Big Society: a new policy environment for the third sector in England’. Voluntary Sector Review, 1 (3): 379-89.
Big Lottery Fund (2011) Transforming Local Infrastructure Programme – Guidance Notes. London, Big Lottery Fund.
Cabinet Office (2011a) OCS Strategic Partners Transition Programme Equality Impact Assessment. London, Cabinet Office. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/resource-library/strategic-partners-transition-programme-equality-impact-assessment (published 23.03.11, accessed and downloaded 30.01.12).
Cabinet Office (2011b) ‘Office for Civil Society Appoints Strategic Partners’
(published 22.03.11, accessed 30.01.12).
Cameron, D. (2006) ‘From state welfare to social welfare’, Speech to the National Council for Voluntary Organisations, 14 December 2006.
http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2006/12/David_Cameron_From_state_welfare_to_social_welfare.aspx, accessed 24.08.11.
Cameron, D. (2009) ‘The Big Society’, Hugo Young Memorial Lecture, 10 November 2009.
http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/11/David_Cameron_The_Big_Society.aspx, accessed 23.8.11.
Chorley, M. and Merrick, M. (2011) ‘Francis Maude: Big Society? It's nothing to do with us’, The Independent, 02.10.11.
Collins, R. (2004) Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Conservative Party (2008) A Stronger Society: Voluntary Action in the 21st Century. London, Conservative Party.
Cook, S. (2010) Interview with Nick Hurd, Third Sector 17.08.10.
Crisp, R., Macmillan, R., Robinson, D. and Wells, P. (2009) ‘Continuity or Change: what a future Conservative government might mean for regional, housing and welfare policies’. People, Place and Policy Online, 3 (1): 58-74.
Gamble, A. (1988) The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism. Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Gamble, A. (1996) Hayek: The Iron Cage of Liberty. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Glasman, M. (1996) Unnecessary suffering: Managing market utopia. London, Verso.
Griffiths, S. (2007) ‘Pluralism, neo-liberalism and the ‘all-knowing’ state’. Journal of Political Ideologies, 16 (3): 295-311.
Griffiths, S. (2011) ‘‘Comrade Hayek’ or the revival of liberalism? Andrew Gamble's engagement with the work of Friedrich Hayek’. Journal of Political Ideologies, 12 (2): 189-210.
Hayek, F. A. (1979) Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Volume 3: The Political Order of a Free People. London, Routledge.
Howarth, G. and Kendall, G. (2011) ‘A better big society: how Labour can make the ‘big society’ its own’. London, Progress, March 2011.
Kendall, J. (2009) ‘The UK: ingredients in a hyperactive horizontal policy environment’ in J. Kendall (ed.) Handbook of Third Sector Policy in Europe: Multi-level Processes and Organised Civil Society. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 67-94.
Kendall, J. (2010) ‘Bringing ideology back in: the erosion of political innocence in English third sector policy’. Journal of Political Ideologies, 15 (3): 241-58.
Lewis, J. (2005) ‘New Labour's Approach to the Voluntary Sector: Independence and the Meaning of Partnership’. Social Policy and Society, 4: 121-31.
Macmillan, R. (2011) ‘Supporting the voluntary sector in an age of austerity: the U.K. coalition government’s consultation on improving support for frontline civil society organisations in England’. Voluntary Sector Review, 2 (1): 115-24.
Macmillan, R. (2013) Making sense of the Big Society: perspectives from the third sector. TSRC Working Paper 90, Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre.
McGinnis, M. D. and Ostrom, E. (2011) ‘Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, Public Administration and Polycentricity’. Public Administration Review, 72 (1): 15-25.
Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds) (2009) The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Norman, J. (2010) The Big Society: The Anatomy of the New Politics. Buckingham, University of Buckingham Press.
Office for Civil Society (2010) Supporting a Stronger Civil Society: An Office for Civil Society consultation on improving support for frontline civil society organisations. London, Cabinet Office.
Parry, J., Alcock, P. and Kendall, J. (2010) Opportunity and influence: the third sector and the 2010 general election. TSRC Working Paper 44, Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre.
Peck, J. (2010) Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Petsoulas, C. (2001) Hayek’s Liberalism and its origins: His idea of spontaneous order and the Scottish Enlightenment. London, Routledge.
Polanyi, M. (1951) The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Sage, D. (2012) ‘A challenge to liberalism? The communitarianism of the Big Society and Blue Labour’. Critical Social Policy, 32 (3): 365-82.
Salamon, L. M. (1987) ‘Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure, and Third-Party Government: Toward a Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State’. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16 (1-2): 29-49.
Scott, M. (2011) ‘Reflections on ‘The Big Society’’. Community Development Journal, 46 (1): 132-37.
Seddon, N. (2007) Who Cares? How State Funding and Political Activism Change Charity. London, Civitas, Institute for the Study of Civil Society.
Short, J. C., Moss, T. W. and Lumpkin, G. T. (2009) ‘Research in social entrepreneurship: past contributions and future opportunities’. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3 (2): 161-94.
Smith, M. J. (2010) 'From Big Government to Big Society: Changing the State-Society Balance'. Parliamentary Affairs, 63 (4): 818-33.
Snowdon, P. (2010) Back from the Brink: The Extraordinary Fall and Rise of the Conservative Party. London, Harper Press.
Social Justice Policy Group (2006) Denying the Vulnerable a Second Chance: Undervaluing Britain’s Third Sector in the fight against poverty. Third sector working group, State of the Nation Report, London, Social Justice Policy Group.
Spear, R. (2006) ‘Social entrepreneurship: a different model?’. International Journal of Social Economics, 33 (5/6): 399-410.
Stedman-Jones, D. (2012) Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Taylor, M. (2012) ‘The changing fortunes of community’. Voluntary Sector Review, 3 (1): 15-34.
Taylor, R., Parry, J. and Alcock, P. (2012) From crisis to mixed picture to phoney war: tracing third sector discourse in the 2008/9 recession. TSRC Working Paper 78, Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre.
Taylor Gooby, P. and Stoker, G. (2011) ‘The Coalition Programme: A New Vision for Britain or Politics as Usual’. Political Quarterly, 82 (1): 4-15
Wainwright, H. (1994) Arguments for a New Left: Answering the Free Market Right. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Wei, N (2010) ‘Navigating the Big Society, part 1’, 9 September 2010,
http://natwei.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/navigating-the-big-society-part-1/, accessed 8 Feb 2012.
Whelan, R. (2000) Involuntary Action: How Voluntary is the Voluntary Sector? London, Civitas, Institute for the Study of Civil Society.
Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O. and Shulman, J. M. (2009) ‘A typology of social entrepreneurs: motives, search processes and ethical challenges’. Journal of Business Venturing, 24 (5): 519-32.

Date:01 July 2013
Series/Collection Name:TSRC Working Paper Series
Keywords:Third sector, Big Society, Coalition Government, Hayek, spontaneous order, independence.
Subjects:H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Related URLs:
Funders:Economic and Social Research Council, Office for Civil Society, Barrow Cadbury Trust
Copyright Holders:Third Sector Research Centre
ID Code:1798

Export Reference As : ASCII + BibTeX + Dublin Core + EndNote + HTML + METS + MODS + OpenURL Object + Reference Manager + Refer + RefWorks
Share this item :
QR Code for this page

Repository Staff Only: item control page