ePapers Repository

Putting evaluations to use : from measuring to endorsing social value

Arvidson, Malin and Kara, Helen (2013) Putting evaluations to use : from measuring to endorsing social value. Working Paper. Third Sector Research Centre (TSRC), Birmingham.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives .

WP110_Arvidson_and_Kara.pdf
346Kb

URL of Published Version: http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/tsrc/documents/tsrc/working-papers/working-paper-110.pdf

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of ‘social value’, emphasized in the recently implemented Social Value Act. It argues that evaluations can play an important role in advocating the status of social value. Evaluations highlight priorities and interests and can offer an important way of evidencing and promoting social value in order that it becomes an active ingredient in decision-making in the commissioning of public services. This is essential, since the implementation of the Social Value Act is made difficult by the fact that social value is hard to define and that commissioners are presented with goals and priorities that may compete with a focus on social values. This paper elaborates on a set of themes that can help us explore evaluation frameworks with a view to highlighting where and how evaluations can endorse social values, such as social inclusion, as a feature of how public services are delivered by third sector organisations. This, we argue, will be crucial for the Social Value Act to become a meaningful addition to the way public services are procured and commissioned, and for third sector organisations to secure continued public service contracts based on arguments and values that play on their presumed advantages over other service deliverers.

Type of Work:Monograph (Working Paper)
School/Faculty:Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Social Sciences
Department:School of Social Policy, Third Sector Research Centre
References:

Arvidson, M., and Lyon, F. (2013) ’Social Impact Measurement and Non-profit Organisations: Compliance, Resistance, and Promotion’, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Pre-print online publication.
Axford, N., Little, M., Morpeth, L., & Weyts, A. (2005). Evaluating Children’s services: recent conceptual and methodological developments. British Journal of Social Work, 35(1), 73–88.
Barman, E., & MacIndoe, H. (2012). Institutional Pressures and Organizational Capacity: The Case of Outcome Measurement1. Sociological Forum, 27(1), 70–93.
Barman, E. (2007). What is the Bottom Line for Nonprofit Organizations? A History of Measurement in the British Voluntary Sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(2), 101–115.
Billis, D., and Glennerster, H. (1998) ’Human services and the voluntary sector: towards a theory of comparative advantage’, Journal of Social policy, 27 (01): 79-98.
Brisolara, S. (1998) ’The History of Participatory Evaluation and Current Debates in the Field’, New Directions for Evaluation, 80 (Winter): 25-41.
Christensen, R. A., & Ebrahim, A. (2006). How Does Accountability Affect Mission? The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(2), 195–209.
Copestake, J. (2007) ’Mainstreaming Microfinance: Social Performance Management or Mission Drift?’, World Development, 35 (10): 1721-38.
Doyle, D., & Scott, R. (Eds.). (2009). Volunteers in hospice and palliative care: a resource for voluntary service managers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ebrahim, A. (2002). Information Struggles: The Role of Information in the Reproduction of NGO-Funder Relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 84–114.
Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1995). Non-Governmental Organizations - Performance and Accountability. London: Earthscan.
Eikenberry, A., & Kluver, J. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.
Ellis, J., Gregory, T., & Services, C. E. (2009). Accountability and learning: developing monitoring and evaluation in the third sector. London: Charities Evaluation Services.
Gibbon, J., & Dey, C. (2011). Developments in Social Impact Measurement in the Third Sector: Scaling Up or Dumbing Down? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 31(1), 63–72.
Greene, J. (2012) ’Values-engaged evaluation’ in M. Segone (ed.) Evaluation for equitable development results. Washington: Unicef (pp. 192-208).
Greene, J. (1994) ‘Qualitative Program Evaluation. Practice and Promise’ in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 530-44). London: Sage Pbl
16
Hall, K. and Arvidson, M. (2013) ’How do we know if social enterprise works? Tools for assessing social enterprise performance’ in S. Denny and F. Seddon (eds), Social enterprise: accountability and evaluation around the world. London: Routledge.
Hall, M. (2012) Evaluation Logics in the Third Sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Pre-print version published on-line
Hay, K. (2012) ‘Strengthening equity-focused evaluations through insights from feminist theory and approaches’ in M. Segone (ed.) Evaluation for equitable development results. Washington: Unicef (pp. 39-58).
HM Government (2012a) Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012. London: The National Archives.
HM Government (2012b) Open Public Services White Paper. London: Cabinet Office.
HM Government (2012c) Procurement policy note – the Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012 – advice for commissioners and procurers. London: The Cabinet Office.
House, E. R. (2004) ’Intellectual history in evaluation’ in M. C. Alkin (ed.), Evaluation roots. California: Sage Publications Inc. (pp. 218-224).
Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity : The Infl uences of Professionalism in the Nonprofi t Sector. Administrative Science Quarterly.
Kovandžić, M., Funnell, E., Hammond, J., Ahmed, A., Edwards, S., Clarke, P., Hibbert, D., et al. (2012) ’The space of access to primary mental health care: a qualitative case study’, Health and place, 18 (3): 536-51.
Kushner, S. (2012) ’Case study and equity in evaluation’ in M. Segone (ed.), Evaluation for equitable development results. Washington: Unicef (pp. 172-91).
Macmillan, R. (2012). “Distinction” in the third sector. Working Paper no. 89, Third Sector Research Centre, Birmingham.
Moxham, C. (2009). Performance measurement: Examining the applicability of the existing body of knowledge to nonprofit organisations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(7), 740–763.
Moxham, C., & Boaden, R. (2007). The impact of performance measurement in the voluntary sector: Identification of contextual and processual factors. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(8), 826–845.
Nicholls, J., Lawlor, E., Neltzert, E. and Goodspeed, T. (2012) A guide to social return on investment. London: The Cabinet Office, Office of the Third Sector.
Ógáin, E. N., Lumley, T. and Pritchard, D. (2012) Impact measurement among charities and social enterprises. London: New Philanthropy Capital.
Palfrey, C., Thomas, P. and Phillips, C. (2012) Evaluation for the real world: the impact of evidence in policy making. Bristol: Policy Press.
Power, M. (1999). The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W. and Freeman, H. E. (2004) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. London: Sage.
Sacks, J. (2002). The money trail. Report 2002. London: New Economics Foundation
17
Schreiner, M. (2002) ’Aspects of outreach: a framework for discussion of the social benefits of microfinance’, Journal of International Development, 14 (5): 591-603.
Taylor-Powell and Henert. (2008) Developing a logic model: teaching and training guide. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Thatcher, J. and Sharp, L. (2008) ‘Measuring the local economic impact of National Health Service procurement in the UK: an evaluation of the Cornwall Food Programme and LM3’, Local Environment, 13 (3), 253-70.
Westall, A. (2009) ’Value and the Third Sector’, TSRC Working Paper 25
Woller, G. (2002) ‘From market failure to marketing failure: market orientation as the key to deep outreach in microfinance’, Journal of International Development, 14 (3): 305–324. Doi: 10.1002/jid.883
Woller, G. (2006) Evaluating MFIs’ Social Performance: A Measurement Tool. Washington: USAid.

Date:October 2013
Keywords:social value, evaluations, Third Sector Organisations (TSO), public services, commissioning
Subjects:H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Related URLs:
URLURL Type
http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/tsrc/index.aspxUNSPECIFIED
Funders:Economic and Social Research Council , Office for Civil Society, Barrow Cadbury Trust
Copyright Holders:TSRC
ID Code:1851

Export Reference As : ASCII + BibTeX + Dublin Core + EndNote + HTML + METS + MODS + OpenURL Object + Reference Manager + Refer + RefWorks
Share this item :
QR Code for this page

Repository Staff Only: item control page