Qian, Wenyi (2023) ‘Dialogic art history’. Review of: Vessels: The Object as Container, edited by Claudia Brittenham, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 196pp, 78 col. plates, 23 b. & w. illus., £38.49 ISBN 9780198832577; Conditions of Visibility, edited by Richard Neer, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 168pp, 66 col. plates, £24.99 ISBN 9780198845560; Figurines: Figuration and the Sense of Scale, edited by Jaś Elsner, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, 208pp, 77 col. plates, £36.49 ISBN 9780198861096; Landscape and Space: Comparative Perspectives from Chinese, Mesoamerican, Ancient Greek, and Roman Art, edited by Jaś Elsner, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 208pp, 95 col. plates, £65.00 ISBN 9780192845955. Visual Conversations in Art and Archaeology Series. Journal of Art Historiography (29). ISSN 2042-4752
PDF - Published Version qian.pdf 274Kb |
URL of Published Version: https://arthistoriography.wordpress.com/29-dec23/
Identification Number/DOI: 10.48352/uobxjah.00004326
Abstract
This review discussed four volumes under the Oxford University Press’s series ‘Visual Conversations in Art and Archaeology’: Vessels: The Object as Container, Conditions of Visibility, Figurines: Figuration and the Sense of Scale, and Landscape and Space: Comparative Perspectives from Chinese, Mesoamerican, Ancient Greek, and Roman Art. It assessed the extent to which what the authors of this series termed ‘comparativism of method’ could be a viable approach to tackle long-grained epistemic asymmetries in art-historical methodologies and productively advance a global art history. The volumes succeed in relativising and revising presumed universality of Eurocentric concepts such as ‘figurine’ and ‘landscape’ for a more inclusive discussion in the future, while offering constructive, multidirectional dialogues across regional specialisms. The review further pointed out several limits to the comparativism proposed by the series: specifically the boundary between method and personality in scholarship, the danger of intensifying inequalities of academic resources and infrastructures between the Global North and the Global South, and the need to further open up such dialogues to practitioners outside of ancient art and archaeology.
Type of Work: | Article |
---|---|
School/Faculty: | Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Arts & Law |
Department: | Department of Art History, Curating and Visual Studies |
Additional Information: | This article is archived in ePapers for preservation purposes |
Date: | December 2023 |
Keywords: | global art history, comparativism of method, dialogic, scale, ancient art and archaeology, epistemic asymmetry |
Subjects: | N Fine Arts > NX Arts in general |
Copyright Status: | Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors may subsequently archive and publish the pdfs as produced by the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. Copyright restrictions apply to the use of any images contained within the articles. This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
ID Code: | 4326 |
Local Holdings: |
|
Repository Staff Only: item control page