]> A Transcription of John in Codex Sangallensis 1394 Created byThe Verbum Project P.H. Burton J. Balserak H.A.G. Houghton D.C. Parker The Arts and Humanities Research Council The Institute for Textual Scholarship and Electronic Editing Version 1.0, last updated 2.2.2011 The Institute for Textual Scholarship and Electronic Editing University of Birmingham 2.2.2011

This file is available for download from the e-papers section of the University of Birmingham Research Archive (UBIRA) www.ubira.bham.ac.uk

Available for noncommercial re-use provided attribution is made to the original creators and the subsequent derivative is licensed as ShareAlike (Creative Commons by-nc-sa)

 Switzerland St Gall Stadtbibliothek s.n. Codex Sangallensis 16 7.978a Xn n 67122 8391 Fragmentum Euangelii Secundum Iohannem (ex Quattuor Evangeliis) A fragment of John, from a manuscript of the four Gospels in order Mt Jo Lc Mc Latin Parchment

In two columns.

Written in uncial.

Black ink with rubrics

 Italy Fifth century Black and white photographs in ITSEE, supplied by Vetus Latina-Institut. Images of the Stiftsbibliothek fragments of the Synoptic Gospels (but not John) are online at http://www.e-codices.unifr.ch/en/csg/1394/ Wordsworth, J., Sanday, W. and White, H.J., Portions of the Gospels according to St Mark and St Matthew. (Oxford Old Latin Biblical Texts 2). Oxford 1886. B. Bischoff, in Miscellanea Giovanni Mercati, Vol. 1, Rome, 1946, pp. 420-4

This transcription was made by the Verbum Project as part of an online and printed edition of the Old Latin versions of John between 2003 and 2010.

This transcription covers ff. 10-11. These contain John 19:13-17, 24-42. The rest of the manuscript is in various places; the bulk at St Gall Stiftsbibliothek 1394.The transcription includes foliation, lineation, all punctuation and abbreviations. Although the editors agree on the readings of the extant part of Folio 10, they differ in the restoration. Our edition has followed Bischoff's reconstruction, while supplying the differences between the editions as footnotes. It should also be noted that while White regularly finds the first 1-3 letters illegible on the left hand side of Folio 11, they are quite clear in the plates; it seems they were still folded over when White consulted the manuscript, but have subsequently been flattened. White was, however, better placed than the present editors to judge the relative antiquity of hands and correctors, and we also reproduce his transcription of the High German glosses as a footnote. The initial transcription file was a plain text file for use with COLLATE. Further information about the procedures followed may be found in the electronic edition at http://www.iohannes.com/vetuslatina/

The file was converted to XML according to the IGNTP guidelines for New Testament manuscripts, version 1.1 (a subset of the TEI P5). A link to these guidelines may be found on the 'Resources' page at www.igntp.org (and also on www.ubira.bham.ac.uk).

 Transcription converted to the TEI XML schema and corrected for parsing by HH
ditprotribunali inlocoquidicitur lychostrotushebrai‐ caehebraice Bischoff; hebraeice Whiteautemgabba‐ thagabbatha Bischoff; gennetha Whiteeratautem praeparatiopaschae horaeraterat Bischoff; OM Whitequasisex‐ taetaitiudaeisec‐ cerexuesteratat Bischoff; ad Whiteilli exclamauerunt tollecrucifigeeumcrucifige eum Bischoff; eum crucifige Whitedi xitilliillispilatusregemregem Bischoff; rege&nbar; White uestrumcrucifigamcrucifigam Bischoff; crucifiga&nbar; White responderuntprin‐ cipessacerdotumnos nonhabemusre‐ gemnisicaesaremcaesarem Bischoff; caesare&nbar; White tuncergotradidit eisillumutcrucifi‐ geretur Susceperuntergo ihm·etgestanssi‐ bicrucemperue‐ nitinlocum diuiseruntOMsibi uestimentaBischoff suggests alternatively indumentamea Bischoff suggests this and the next two lines are insetetsuprasupra or super Bischoff; super Whiteuestem meammiser&unt;The reconstruction of lines 3 and 4 are rather short, but there is no likely longer known textual form. sortem militesquidem haecfecerunt stabantautemiux‐ tacrucemih&nbar;uma‐ tereiusetsororma‐ triseiusmariacleo‐ paecleopae Bischoff; cleope White. The reconstruction is slightly short. The explanation may be in the spelling of Cleophae (cf. Cleophaes in a)etmariamag‐ dalene cumuidissetautem ihsmatremcum uidisset autem ihs matrem Bischoff; ihs autem ut uidit matrem Whitesuam etdiscipulumad‐ stantemquemdi‐ ligebataitait Bischoff; dicit White (White breaks the line as dili-gebat)matrisu‐ aemuliereccefili‐ ustuusdeindedicit discipuloeccema‐ tertuaetexillaho‐ raaccepitillam discipulusilleinsua iohannen ΙΔAccording to White, these last two characters in a later hand; this is debatable, however, and does not seem to be the case in the Synoptic Gospel fragments. Posteaihs·sciensquo‐ niamomniacon‐ summatasuntut scripturaimplere‐ turaitsitioetuas positumeratace‐ toplenumhysopo admiscentesThe punctuation here was added laterspon‐ giamergoplenam acetoperticaecir‐ cumponentesop‐ tuleruntorieius Cumergoaccepis‐ setihs·acetumdixit omniaconsum‐ matasuntetincli‐ natocapitecrediditreddidit spm·iudaeiergo quoniamcenapu‐ raeratneremane‐ rentincrucemcor‐ porainsabbatoerat enimmagnusdies illiussabbatiroga‐ ueruntpilatum utfrangerentur eorumcuracruraettol‐ lerenturdecruce Ueneruntergo militesetilliusqui‐ demprimifrege‐ runtcruraetal‐ teriussimiliter quicrucifixiera&nt; cumeo Adihm·autemcu&nbar; uenissentutetuide‐ renteumiammor‐ tuumnonfrege‐ runteiuscrura sedunusexmili‐ tibuslancealatus eiuspercussitetexi‐ uitcontinuosan‐ guisetaquaetqui uidittestificatur ettestimonium perhibuitetuerum secundumElaborate but illegible cursive note running down lines 1-8 in left margin estetuerumestOMtes‐ timoniumeiuset illescitquiauera dicitutetuoscre‐ datisfactasunt enimhaecutscrip‐ turaeinplerent&ur; ossumnonco&nbar;‐ fringetisabeo Etiterumaliascrip‐ tura uidebuntad queminquem conpuncxer&unt; Over the next seven lines, occasional Old High German glosses in small minuscule hand. These are transcribed by White as: post = after, haec = desu, autem = so, rogauit = piot, qui = der, fuit = uuas, discipulus = disco, occulte = taucone, autem = so, propter = duruh, metum = forahain, iudaeorum = iudeono.Posthaecautemro‐ gauitpilatumio‐ sephabarimathi‐ aquifuitdiscipu‐ lusihu·occulteau‐ temproptermetu&nbar; iudaeorumuttol‐ leretcorpusihu· etpermisitpilatus ueneruntergo ettulerunteum Uenitautemetni‐ codemusquipri‐ mumueneratad ihm·nocteferens mixturammur‐ raeetaloenqua‐ silibrascentum Acceperuntergo corpusihmihu·etal‐ ligauerunteum linteiscumaroma‐ tibussicutestcon‐ suetudoiudaeis sepelire Eratauteminlo‐ coubicrucifixus esthortusetinhor‐ tomonumentum nouuminquono&nbar;‐ dumquisquam posituseratibier‐ gopropterparas‐ ceuequiaiuxta